刑事诉讼证据开示程序的构建
毕业论文1.61W
内容摘要 证据开示是指控辩双方在庭审前或审判过程,依照一定的程序和方式,相互之间开示各自控制或掌握的诉讼证据和与之有关资料的一种制度。它在促进实体公正、程序公正以及诉讼效率上都有积极的作用。正因为如此,不管是大陆法系国家,还是英美法系国家的刑事诉讼中都建立有一种证据开示制度,且有从单方开示向双方开示、开示范围不断扩大等趋势。我国现行刑事诉讼法虽然也有一些类似证据开示制度的规定,但却很不完整,也很不科学,导致在实践中存在诸多问题。之所以出现这种情况,这与我国重实体轻程序,重打击犯罪轻人权保障的诉讼观念有关,也与我国诉讼模式有关。我国应当根据双向开示、不对等开示等原则,构建具有中国特色的证据开示制度。其中,要尤其注意开示时间、开示地点、开示范围以及开示纠纷的解决等方面的构建。关键词:刑事诉讼 证据开示 程序 构建
On the Construction of Evidence Discovery in Criminal Litigation
Abstract
Evidence discovery is a system which means before putting on trial or during the judging the accuser and the defense according to regular procedures and mode, each other shows lawsuit proof or related material they own mastered. It has played a great part in substantive justice procedural justice and litigation efficiency. As a result, both English-American Legal System Country and Continental Legal System Country have already established Evidence discovery system in Criminal procedure. What’s more, it exists an enlarging tendency from unilateral discovery to both sides discovery. So do the discovery scope. Current Criminal procedure law in our country exist similar regulations on criminal litigation. However, it is neither completed nor scientific. Consequently, it has brought about a great many problems in practice. What causes this situation? I think it is not only related to our country paying much attention to substantiality and punishing crime instead of procedure and human rights but also related to our country’s litigation mode. Our country ought to construct evidence discovery system which have a characteristic our own base on both two-way discovery and unequal discovery principles. Above all we should take notice of constructing on discovery time, discovery address, discovery range and solving of discovery words: Criminal Litigation, Evidence Discovery,Procedure,Construct
前 言
我国在1996 年的刑事诉讼法中,引入了当事人主义诉讼模式的某些合理成分,改变了传统的由法官直接调查证据的方式,确定了控辩双方向法庭举证、质证,同时也不排除法官调查权的'一种特殊的审判方式。这种审判方式的顺利开展,需要相关制度的支撑。证据开示制度就是其中的一个重要制度。但是,1996年的刑事诉讼法不仅没有建立一种完全的证据开示制度,反而加大了律师阅卷难的问题。这和审判方式改革的方向是不相符合的。正因为如此,在我国建立一种证据开示制度目前已基本达成共识。但是如何在我国刑事诉讼中建立证据开示制度,却存在这样或那样的争议。证据开示不仅刑事证据法的规则之一,也是法律程序的一部分;它不仅是实现实体法的手段,而且也是程序公正的重要要求。在我国,虽已有初步的证据开示制度,但还没有建立起实质意义上的控辩双方双向证据开示制度。本文的目的在于通过阐述证据开示制度在刑事诉讼中的重要意义而试图为我国证据开示制度的构建提出一些建议性的措施。论文出处(作者):
论我国量刑规范化的制度改革
On the Construction of Evidence Discovery in Criminal Litigation
Abstract
Evidence discovery is a system which means before putting on trial or during the judging the accuser and the defense according to regular procedures and mode, each other shows lawsuit proof or related material they own mastered. It has played a great part in substantive justice procedural justice and litigation efficiency. As a result, both English-American Legal System Country and Continental Legal System Country have already established Evidence discovery system in Criminal procedure. What’s more, it exists an enlarging tendency from unilateral discovery to both sides discovery. So do the discovery scope. Current Criminal procedure law in our country exist similar regulations on criminal litigation. However, it is neither completed nor scientific. Consequently, it has brought about a great many problems in practice. What causes this situation? I think it is not only related to our country paying much attention to substantiality and punishing crime instead of procedure and human rights but also related to our country’s litigation mode. Our country ought to construct evidence discovery system which have a characteristic our own base on both two-way discovery and unequal discovery principles. Above all we should take notice of constructing on discovery time, discovery address, discovery range and solving of discovery words: Criminal Litigation, Evidence Discovery,Procedure,Construct
前 言
我国在1996 年的刑事诉讼法中,引入了当事人主义诉讼模式的某些合理成分,改变了传统的由法官直接调查证据的方式,确定了控辩双方向法庭举证、质证,同时也不排除法官调查权的'一种特殊的审判方式。这种审判方式的顺利开展,需要相关制度的支撑。证据开示制度就是其中的一个重要制度。但是,1996年的刑事诉讼法不仅没有建立一种完全的证据开示制度,反而加大了律师阅卷难的问题。这和审判方式改革的方向是不相符合的。正因为如此,在我国建立一种证据开示制度目前已基本达成共识。但是如何在我国刑事诉讼中建立证据开示制度,却存在这样或那样的争议。证据开示不仅刑事证据法的规则之一,也是法律程序的一部分;它不仅是实现实体法的手段,而且也是程序公正的重要要求。在我国,虽已有初步的证据开示制度,但还没有建立起实质意义上的控辩双方双向证据开示制度。本文的目的在于通过阐述证据开示制度在刑事诉讼中的重要意义而试图为我国证据开示制度的构建提出一些建议性的措施。论文出处(作者):
论我国量刑规范化的制度改革
-
倾听音乐、聆听音乐、静听音乐
音乐欣赏,是人的听觉器官接触音乐作品的音响运动形式而产生的一种能动的审美活动,也是一种通过音乐形象去体验和认识社会生活的积极的思维活动。通过音乐欣赏教学,可以接触古今中外的各种题材、体裁、风格的作品,从而开阔音乐视野,懂得一些基本的音乐知识,培养高尚的...
-
“多读”是语文教学的精髓
在文章中,不论是事情的记叙,人物和情境的描写,还是事物的介绍说明,观点的阐述和议论,都直接或间接,直露或含蓄地表达着作者的思想感情倾向,对学生起思想导航和激励作用,产生美感和丰富的想象,使学生不断地受到真善美的熏陶和感染。这在多数情况下都是通过朗读来实现的,忽...
-
供电企业班组员工绩效管理探讨
近年来,供电企业在不断创新与发展中,取得了不错的效益,随之而来的就是员工的绩效考核问题越发严重。为此,我们根据供电企业的特点,从整体方面对绩效考核探索出一个完善的考核模式。在现代信息社会,电成为了人们生活中必不可少的一部分,而供电企业也因为行业的增大而对...
-
浅议体育课多班同课窘境的应对策略论文
随着学校规模的不断扩大,在同一课次、同一场地上体育课的班级数也越来越多,而由于受场地、器材等因素的影响,造成了体育课多班同课教学的窘境。一、体育课多班同课教学窘境的原因1、体育设施配备滞后,同场教学有序开展受到制约。场地、器材配备与同课教学需求的差...